ABSTRACT universal User Manual Page 39

  • Download
  • Add to my manuals
  • Print
  • Page
    / 39
  • Table of contents
  • BOOKMARKS
  • Rated. / 5. Based on customer reviews
Page view 38
is, if anything, clearer still. Take away from the various figures what makes
them figures and nothing remains. It may be said that lines might still exist,
even if they did not enter into figures. But such lines would not be these lines,
for these are the sides of a figure, and if figure went, they too would go. Thus,
just as figure has being only in its differentiations, so these have being only as
differentiations of it.
99
VI
We have foun d, then, that there is a constant thread running through the
thought of the Anglo-American idealists, and the origins of that thread can
be traced back to Hegel.
100
Thus, while not everything these Idealists say
about the concrete universal makes sense in Hegelian terms (at least, given
my reading of Hegel), a central part of their conception does. Moreover, we
have seen that the issues behind that conception are not in fact alien to us,
but relate directly to debates concerning the content of experience, and the
metaphysical implications of the claim that this content is conceptual all the
way down: the doctrine of the concrete universal, therefore, perhaps
deserves to be seen as a live option in that debate, and not the peculiar piece
of exotica it is so often presented as being.
101
University of Sheffield
99
Ibid., 584.
100
I would not want to claim that the influence of Hegel here is always direct: it is doubtless
often mediated by other figures who helped to shape Anglo-American Idealism, such as Lotze
and Sigwart, for whom the Hegelian conception also played an important role; but that story
cannot be explored here.
101
I have presented versions of this paper at the 2004 conference of the Hegel Society of Great
Britain; at departmental seminars at Sheffield and York; and at the History of Political Thought
Seminar at Cambridge; I am grateful to those who made helpful comments on these occasions. I
am also grateful to Fraser MacBride and Peter Nicholson, and to an anonymous referee for this
journal, for a number of suggestions that led to improvements to the text. I would also like to
acknowledge the support of the Arts and Humanties Research Council, for funding the research
leave during which this paper was largely written.
HEGEL AND THE CONCRETE UNIVERSAL 153
Page view 38
1 2 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39

Comments to this Manuals

No comments